If you look at two rank configurations, 3200 C14 1T is only around 1% behind 3600 C16 1T. The problem is that a bunch of combos won't run stably at 1T with four ranks of DDR4-3600. Well, it is interesting, especially if you are looking at optimizing even to smaller percentages of improvement! Not that I worry too much about whether I'm getting 121% vs only 119% I don't have anything that heavily memory-performance oriented anyway.The sweet spot is two ranks per channel at the tightest timings you can get. However, from the tests shown, a lot of 3600 is at 2T already, and the highest 2T performers are still inching past the highest 1T performers. I thought 3600 was the sweet spot for Ryzen for getting 1T (higher would only be 2T) due to the backend fabric setting everything higher than 3600 to 2T. Overclocking and Latency TuningĢBe_or_Not2Be said:Hmm. The test system uses AMD’s fast Ryzen 7 3700X to feed data through MSI’s memory-mastering MEG X570 Ace from Toshiba’s OCZ RD400 SSD, while Gigabyte’s GeForce RTX 2070 Gaming OC 8G pushes the pixels. Readers who’d like to understand a bit more about that data rate and timings should check out our PC Memory 101 feature. We’re fortunate enough to have a full range of 2x 16GB DDR4-3200 kits with 16-18-18-36 timings to compare, and have included the cheapest of those for this battle of value supremacy.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |